Template:Did you know nominations/Beechwood House, Highgate

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
late submission

Beechwood House, Highgate

  • Reviewed: Andrew Ross
  • Comment: I'm aware its just outside the nomination period :(

Created by Gareth E. Kegg (talk). Self-nominated at 10:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC).

  • This is the most interesting thing you could think of? Doesn't it have solid-gold toilets or something? EEng 22:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I think its quite a good hook. It illustrates the plutocratic congeniality on the rarefied peaks of the London property market. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 11:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Except that it's exactly what you'd expect. If the King of SA sold a house to a Welsh coalminer, that would illustrate something (though I'm not immediately sure what exactly). I'd go with the "uneventful two-storeyed stucco house" description; the foxes that kept down the rats and mice, beetles and frogs; or the Roman-style bathing complex, ghastly mock-classical designs, and the super basement (or, more likely, the super-basement, which is an interesting oxymoron, when you think of it). EEng 13:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg This was nominated five days late, and with a not very interesting hook. If it had been a day or two late I could stretch things, but not nearly double the normal period for an experienced DYK nominator. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)