Template:Did you know nominations/Polish postmodernism

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Polish postmodernism's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Mentoz86 (talk) 09:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC).

Polish postmodernism

Crooked house in Sopot

Created by Poeticbent (talk). Self nominated at 21:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC).

Symbol question.svg Interesting article and hook, well illustrated with a free pic. Please place inline citation(s) right after the fact, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 Done. Good catch! Thank you, Gerda Arendt. Poeticbent talk 00:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg Just to offer help, this sentence is unclear, by punctuation : Even though, postmodernism was widely promoted in the so-called Drugi obieg (the Second circulation) by Polish underground press in the 1980s and well-beyond the Martial law in Poland, it was also criticized as amorphous by both, Catholic philosophers, as well as "fallen Marxists" credited with the emergence of Template:Nobreak in Poland – based on extreme relativism and bitter sense of humor (see Mrożek).

May want to reword, expand, or link amorphous ; one of those arty words that we may know but the average reader wouldn't.
Also note: ref number 9 couldn't be traced, but sources a whole paragraph; AGF?
Otherwise very good... Interesting subject... no impact from the hook but no replacement to suggest at the moment. I'll go over it again. Penwatchdog (talk) 06:10, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Actually, other problems with sources listed. I'm still green with this review process; recommend someone else have a look. Penwatchdog (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 Done. Thank you, Penwatchdog. I took your every word to heart and added more new good sources and anchors as well as some clarifications. I hope it helps. Also, if you would like to help out more, please make specific suggestions. Poeticbent talk 21:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Pictogram voting keep.svg pleased enough, Polish sources accepted AGF, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
—Much obliged, Poeticbent talk 22:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)