Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Aduja

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Peter Aduja

  • ALT1:... that Peter Aduja was one of the first Filipino lawyers in Hawaii?
  • ALT2:... that Peter Aduja, was a Republican, and was the first Filipino American ever elected in the United States?
  • Reviewed: Reviewed the DYK for Ideasthesia
  • Comment: Item promoted to GA status on 2 March. Article is comprised of 3732 characters as of this submission. Hook is referenced to the following sources: Valerie Ooka Pang; Li-Rong Lilly Cheng (3 September 1998). Struggling To Be Heard: The Unmet Needs of Asian Pacific American Children. SUNY Press. p. 172. ISBN 978-0-7914-3840-4., Rod Ohira (22 February 2007). "Peter Aduja, distinguished local Filipino". Honolulu Advertiser. Retrieved 4 September 2011., "Hawai'i honors Fil-Am legislator". GMA News. 30 March 2007. Retrieved 8 October 2014., & Gary G. Aguiar (August 1997). Party Mobilization, Class and Ethnicity: The Case of Hawaii, 1930 to 1964. Universal-Publishers. p. 297. ISBN 978-0-9658564-3-0. As article passed GA it should meet all applicable policies and guidelines. Hooks length is 98 to 147 characters in length. I believe that hook meets WP:NEU

Improved to Good Article status by RightCowLeftCoast (talk), Dysepsion (talk). Nominated by RightCowLeftCoast (talk) at 06:43, 5 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks for the comment parameter, you've done my job for me! Checked everything over and it all matches what you've written. I've tweaked the original hook and striked the alternatives. Interesting hook. Good to go.  — ₳aron 11:01, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
If it helps the approval process, as I have done a number of DYK reviews myself, I don't see why not.
Should there be a mention of his political affiliation, or does that violate WP:POV? It is verifiable.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)