Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Liberty Hong Kong

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 22:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Lady Liberty Hong Kong

Lady Liberty Hong Kong during a demonstration in October 2019
Lady Liberty Hong Kong during a demonstration in October 2019
  • ... that Lady Liberty Hong Kong, a statue created during the 2019 Hong Kong protests, was modeled after a female demonstrator whose eye was allegedly ruptured by a police beanbag round? Source: "After an online vote, the team selected the "goddess of democracy" design, which was modeled after a female demonstrator whose eye was allegedly ruptured by a beanbag round shot by the police." (NYT)
    • ALT1:... that Lady Liberty Hong Kong, a statue created during the 2019 Hong Kong protests, surpassed its crowdfunding goal of HK$200 thousand in 6 hours? Source: "The team successfully raised a total of HK$203,933 in 6 hours, surpassing its HK$200,000 goal." (HKFP)

Created by Bonthefox3 (talk) and Yeenosaurus (talk). Nominated by Yeenosaurus (talk) at 01:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Unfortunately, this article is not eligible for DYK, as it was only expanded by about 50%, from 1504 prose characters to 2250 prose characters; a 5x (500%) expansion would need to be to 7520 prose characters, which seems impractical. Also, the nomination was never transcluded despite a message being sent to the nominator's talk page, which is why it wasn't reviewed until now. I am also concerned about the original hook and the equivalent sentence in the article, which copies from the New York Times source, and should be paraphrased instead (and not too closely paraphrased). I hope you will try DYK again in the future with an article that meets the criteria. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)