Template:Did you know nominations/Harold J. Conn

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Harold J. Conn

  • ... that the American bacteriologist Harold Conn was sometimes called "Dr. Stain"? 'Conn was referred to by some as "Dr. Stain".' p285 in [1]

5x expanded by Espresso Addict (talk). Self-nominated at 07:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Hi Espresso Addict, review follows: article moved to mainspace on 4 January; article is of good length; article is well written; article is cited inline to reliable sources throughout (though citations could be improved by using specific page numbers); I can't access all of the sources but I found no copyright violations from the ones I spot checked; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and backed up by the citation; a QPQ has been carried out; looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 11:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Template:U, thanks for the prompt review. Is there a way of using specific pages in a journal article within the citation template? I can't quickly see one, and I don't think my ageing brain is up to learning an entirely new citation method. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Espresso Addict. The two methods I use are to separate out the citations to books and journals into a bibliography and use template:Harvnb to cite authors, year and page numbers (as I did at Temporary gentlemen) or to keep the citations as they are and use template:rp after the ref tag to specify a page number (as I did at Corps of Invalids (Great Britain)). I find the latter method easier to retrofit to an existing article, though perhaps less elegant - Dumelow (talk) 12:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)