Template:Did you know nominations/Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz

Improved to Good Article status by Auntieruth55 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Recent Good article. The article and hook are referenced. No copyright or neutrality issue detected. QPQ not needed. However, the beginning of the hook is extraneous. How about just removing it? See ALT1. Template:Ping.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
  • ALT1:... that Friedrich Wilhelm von Seydlitz acquired a superb mastery of horsemanship, once riding a wild stag and another time riding between the sails of a windmill in full swing?Source:: Lawley, Robert N (1852). General Seydlitz, a Military Biography. W. Clowes & Sons, p. 3.
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Support the shorter ALT1. — JFG talk 06:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Can you give this a tick? Since I suggested the ALT1, I can't make the final approval.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 17:43, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 Done. Sorry, I'm still learning the process here. Thanks for the hint. — JFG talk 02:50, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Template:Ping if all you did was shorten the hook, you can certainly approve the ALT. Here's a tick for you. Yoninah (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi again. I came by to promote this, but do not see anything about a "wild" stag in the book source. It says he rode the stags in the Margrave's park – that would seem to mean they weren't wild, no? Yoninah (talk) 23:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Royal hunting parks were just enclosed/constructed wilderness. But you are right, the sources don't refer to them as wild. Could you maybe just remove the wild part? Template:Ping --KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
  • I'm okay with taking out wild. Although Template:Ping is right: in the margrave's park the would all be wild. 72.77.38.32 (talk) 16:00, 17 May 2017 (UTC) And I'm okay with just using riding between the windmill sails in full swing. Sorry I forgot to sign in above. auntieruth (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping OK, thanks. We'll let the promoter decide between ALT1 and ALT2, both of which are approved. Yoninah (talk) 20:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)