Template:Did you know nominations/Embassy of the Philippines, Warsaw

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 08:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Embassy of the Philippines, Warsaw

Exterior of the Philippine Embassy in Warsaw

Created by Sky Harbor (talk). Self nominated at 03:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg - Long enough, new enough, quality is fine and hook checks out. Slight problem is as to the 1993 piece is supported by an editorial piece. The source can be used, but in the article at least it should attribute who did the questioning, just as the article covers who questioned the re-opening. Image is good to go as it is on Commons. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
  • The thing here is that Amando Doronila doesn't reveal his sources. I could rewrite that part though so that it's as if he is the one questioning it (which seems obvious from the original column piece) if that would be better. --Sky Harbor (talk) 13:53, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Yes, that's exactly what needs to happen. Even if it is "The closing was questioned in an editorial piece by so and so." IT just has to attribute the questioning since an editorial can only be used to support the opinions of the writer. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)