Template:Did you know nominations/Deepak Dhar

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Alex Shih (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Deepak Dhar

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 07:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Comment-Template:PingThis is my first reveiw please bear with me .If needed we can take a second opinion:-
  • Symbol question.svg
  •  DoneReasonably referenced,has amply more than 1500 characters No time lag in submission.
  • Template:Not Done Some small areas need to be cleaned up:-
  • Bibliography portion should be merged with see also.(Most articles do so)
  • Who is Manju? Please use full name
  • What is TIFR? Please expand

Thanks in advanceFORCE RADICAL (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Welcome to DYK reviewing. Please allow to note down a few points here.
  • The reviewer normally starts writing by replacing the comment, "REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING :*" you have started your comments at a place reserved for the nominator. But please don't let this dissuade you in anyway.
  • "Bibliography" is distinct from "See Also" and should not be merged as per Manual of Style.
  • Manju is Deepak Dhar's wife. Full name is Manju Dhar but I do not think it is advisable to mention the full name as the omitted part is the surname she received from her husband.
  • TIFR is Tata Institute of Fundamental Research. I have added the acronym at the first mention of the institute in the article.

Thanks. jojo@nthony (talk) 07:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svgThanks .Sorry for the goof upFORCE RADICAL (talk) 07:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Returning from prep per discussion at WT:DYK#Prep 6. The article needs to be adjusted if ALT2 is to be promoted:
Discussion at WT:DYK
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Template:Ping Template:Ping Template:Ping

Personally, I find this hard to call "hooky". It uses the word "model" 3 times, and the most interesting/unusual thing is the mention of the Abelian sandpile model, which will probably siphon off all the clicks. Yoninah (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

--jojo@nthony (talk) 15:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

  • I'm not too sure that the article would siphon off all the clicks. I mean, we could always assume, but no one actually knows until it reaches the main page. SL93 (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Note: since ALT2 is the hook under consideration, it needs to be visible outside the hatted discussion. (I have also struck the original hook due to issues raised in that discussion.) BlueMoonset (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Template:Re I did not quite get what you meant but have now rephrased the sentence. Trust this resolves the issue. jojo@nthony (talk) 06:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Thank you, it does. Since I had a hand in the ALT2 hook, new reviewer needed to sign off on this. Yoninah (talk) 09:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)