Template:Did you know nominations/Dalen Hotel

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Dalen Hotel's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:09, 15 March 2013 (UTC).

Dalen Hotel

Large wooden hotell building from the 19th century

  • ... that Dalen Hotel (pictured) is among the best preserved wooden hotels from the 19th century?
  • Reviewed: NA

5x expanded by Strachkvas (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 08:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg 5X expansion good. Hook checks out even though source is in Norwegian (Google translate verified hook). Suggest alternate hook to include location of hotel:
  • ALT1: ... that Dalen Hotel (pictured) in Dalen, Telemark, Norway is among the best preserved wooden hotels from the 19th century?
--Mike Cline (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the review, and for providing an alternative hook! I checked your suggested alt hook with location, and corrected the link to "Dalen". If this hook is used, I also propose to de-link the country name (Norway), and possibly move (pictured) to appear directly after the bolded Dalen Hotel. Oceanh (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for pointing at insufficient inline citations; I also notice that the expander of the article now has provided inline citations to every section. I listed a book about the hotel as a possible further source. Oceanh (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png Needs reviewer to confirm that article conforms to DYK rules and ALT hook is valid (new reviewer needed for ALT hook). BlueMoonset (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg AGF for foreign-language hook fact. Expansion was recent and plenty long enough. No close paraphrasing detected (looked at two sources). Suitably referenced. ALT1 is good to go. Schwede66 04:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)