Template:Did you know nominations/Conyers Farm, Edmund C. Converse

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 07:42, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Conyers Farm, Edmund C. Converse

Created by EricEnfermero (talk). Self-nominated at 02:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg new enough created on 24 May, long enough at 4,385 characters, interesting hook in a neutrally written article. QPQ also done. However there are two issues, Notable residents section has no incline citations and whilst it is like that this cannot go on the main page, also I've read and reread the source for the hook which is number 5 in references and it doesn't specifically say it lay unoccupied. It cites year of death, in disrepair and was maintained by Bankers Trust and that it was bought in 1936 but I cannot see where it says unoccupied. Template:Ping can you show me where it says unoccupied.Blethering Scot 15:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • On look at other sources it is actually sourced, but in lead not the main article. I have therefore moved it down into main article as should be sourced there and not in lead. However the Notable residents section is still unsourced and must be fixed or I would suggest removed altogether before this is approved.Blethering Scot 15:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Had looked at the second article and seen no issues, however i didn't realise until now that it was also a new page. Seen as it is i will review it as well. New enough created on 23 May, long enough at 4,205 characters, neutrally written, decent sources and hook is sourced in this article as well. You have addressed the issues I raised. This is good to go.Blethering Scot 20:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)