Template:Did you know nominations/Braaby Church

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Braaby Church's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 17:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC).

Braaby Church

Created/expanded by Ipigott (talk), Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 12:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC).

Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Fred Hobbs

There is a definite article missing in the hook. It should be:
  • Symbol question.svgThe article was created as a stub on 19 April, and expanded fivefold in the days before nomination 24 April. The article is long enough, has inline references, relevant photo without copyright problems. The sources are in a foreign languge that I can read. The three first sentences in the last paragraph of the article, which inludes the hook, may appear to be a bit close paraphrasing and I invite the nominator to comment on that. Iselilja (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Please work with abovementioned criticism, otherwise we will need to delist this nomination in the upcoming days.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 13:54, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Braaby Church

  • Please see if the editing is adequate. Modified hook with an img is also proposed.
  • ALT 2 Hook ... that the bowl of font in Braaby Church (pictured) has relief decorations of Three Kings, an angel holding back a hunter, and a Satan in the form of an ape?--Nvvchar. 10:06, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg No longer close paraphrasing issues. Hook ALT 2 is fine, article is in line with key Wikipedia policies, new and long enough. Good to go. Iselilja (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)