Template:Did you know nominations/Brönnestad Church

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 05:53, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Brönnestad Church

Created by Yakikaki (talk). Self-nominated at 16:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC).

  • I'll step in as reviewer!--Coin945 (talk) 01:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  • New - Article created by Yakikaki on November 20, 2020. ☑Y
  • Long enough – Prose size (text only): 3839 characters (642 words) "readable prose size". ☑Y
  • Within policy: is neutral - Article reads as factual and without an agenda. ☑Y
  • Within policy: cites sources with inline citations - Article is primarily sourced by one book Eriksson, Torkel (1982). "Nyframtagna medeltidsmålningar i Brönnestad" [Recently uncovered medieval paintings in Brönnestad] (PDF). Ale. Historisk tidskrift för Skåneland (in Swedish) (2): 1–20. Retrieved 20 November 2020. Perhaps there are additional sources that can be added? Symbol voting keep.svg
  • Within policy: is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism - Earwig detected Violation Unlikely 2.9% confidence ☑Y
  • Hook Format - correct length and format ☑Y
  • Hook Content interesting to a broad audience - fascinating piece of history ☑Y
  • Hook Content fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article - unable to verify but good-faith trusts nominator Symbol voting keep.svg
  • Hook Content neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people - hook comes across as neutral ☑Y
  • QPQ – nominator has reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Sphingomonadaceae
  • Images: 5 images in article. 4 are Own Work of Hans A. Rosbach, 1 is Own Work of Erik Frohne.☑Y

I'm happy to pass, though first interested in nominator's response to the article essentially being sourced from a single source. Are there any other reliable sources available?--Coin945 (talk) 01:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Coin945 and thanks for the review! Apologies for my somewhat delayed response. The article is based on one book (Wahlöö) and one article (Eriksson), which is mainly about the murals. Having written about the medieval churches in Scania for some time now, I'm sorry to say that this is unusually good. There are 271 medieval churches in the province, and many of them are hardly studied in any depth at all. However, Wahlöö's book covers all of them, briefly but systematically and has proved to be surprisingly reliable also when I've double checked it with primary sources on a few occasions. Eriksson's article is an unusual treat, since it goes into detail about the murals in several ways. I have consulted the standard bibliography (Skånska kyrkor. Kapell, kloster och andra kyrkliga byggnader from 1985) but it doesn't list anything more usable, unfortunately. The murals and the bellfry are mentioned in passing in a relatively recent, good quality overview over the churches of the province published by the Swedish Heritage Board (Available for free here), and the official website of the parish has a very brief description of the church. I could add a few notes from these, but that's about it. Would that be enough, do you think? I'm the first to deplore this strange state of affairs. The contrast is quite striking compared e.g. with the coverage the churches on Gotland have received. Yakikaki (talk) 09:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you Coin945, but would you mind taking a look at this again? I've added the sources I mentioned. Thanks. Yakikaki (talk) 10:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Template:Ping, I'm now happy to pass the article.--Coin945 (talk) 00:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC) Symbol confirmed.svg