Template:Did you know nominations/Boletinellus merulioides

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Boletinellus merulioides, Boletus carminiporus, Boletus illudens, Boletus miniato-olivaceus, Boletus projectellus, Boletus rubripes, Boletus subvelutipes, Phylloporus leucomycelinus, Phylloporus rhodoxanthus, Pulveroboletus ravenelii, Suillus cothurnatus

Phylloporus rhodoxanthusPulveroboletus raveneliiSuillus cothurnatus

Boletus carminiporus

Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 07:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, that's the template max. I manually inserted the three additional articles into the section heading and added article history links and DYKmakes. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 00:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Hook fact good, present and referenced in all articles. Hook length acceptable per multi-nomination guidelines. New articles long enough, expanded articles meet 5x requirements. No policy issues found, and references are good with offline references taken AGF. Looks good, with a lot of effort taken! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevmin (talkcontribs) 21:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)