Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Burton Bridge (1643)

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Battle of Burton Bridge (1643)

Thomas Tyldesley in an 1831 illustration

Created/expanded by Dumelow (talk). Self nom at 23:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Hook: Short enough, interesting, cited. AGF as I am not in Britain and am not a subscriber.
Article: New enough, long enough. AGF on offline sources. What makes this a reliable source?
Symbol question.svg Hold pending clarification of source reliability. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Hello. Nice work, looks to be sheer laziness on my part! That website is the work of a local amateur historian. He is not, as far as I know, a published author so I have replaced the parts sourced to his website with a better RS (the online version of a book on the history of the town). Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 11:30, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, it's still cited to the article for the plaque's date. Shouldn't the plaque itself be enough? Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Fair enough, have switched the ref over - Dumelow (talk) 13:12, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Good to go. AGF on offline and subscription sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:00, 26 February 2012 (UTC)