Template:Did you know nominations/Bangla (band)

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 09:02, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Bangla (band)

  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/KXMZ
  • Comment: Article was created in 2007 and was deleted the same year. It was userfied in 2012 August and was expanded and moved to mainspace in June 2013.

Created/expanded by Kmzayeem (talk). Self nominated at 20:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg How is it interesting that a band moved to a different place? SL93 (talk) 05:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
The band actually moved from India to Bangladesh (I've slightly changed the hook), so thought it would be an interesting hook. Can you propose an alternative hook please? Thanks. --Zayeem (talk) 08:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that the folk-rock band BanglaTemplate:`s debut album, which featured several unknown folk songs, sold some hundred thousand copies in the first two weeks of its release? SL93 (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Also, Symbol confirmed.svg - the article is new enough and long enough with reliable references and no plagiarism. I will let the promoter choose whatever hook that they want. SL93 (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
If ALT1 is to be used, it will have to be verified by a user other than either the one who suggested it or the nominator. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 20:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok I'll go with ALT1.--Zayeem (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg ALT1 needs an independent reviewer. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg ALT1 is good to go for inclusion in DYK! Per SL93's above review, the article and hook meet with DYK criteria and the information provided within the hook is properly cited within the article's text, utilizing references in line with Wikipedia guidelines. Let's move this one on! -- Caponer (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)