Template:Did you know nominations/Armen Dzhigarkhanyan

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (yak) @ 18:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Armen Dzhigarkhanyan

  • ... that Armen Dzhigarkhanyan is claimed to have appeared in more films than any other Russian actor?
  • Reviewed: Cambodian genocide
  • Comment: A number of sources (including, among others, the large weekly Argumenty i Fakty and TV Tsentr) claim that Dzhigarkhanyan is included in the Guinness World Records as the Russian actor with most film appearances. Since their website doesn't give data for Russia, it's impossible to check.

5x expanded by Yerevantsi (talk). Self nominated at 03:54, 14 January 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Date, size, refs are fine. I'd add to the claim in the article "as of 2013" - I think that's the last year of the sources cited, yes? Also, I'd suggest, however, a less weasel-like hook:
  • ALT1: ... that Armen Dzhigarkhanyan has appeared in more films than any other Russian actor?
  • This ALT1 will have to be reviewed by another person. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Yes, I'm good with ALT1. --Երևանցի talk 19:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed for ALT1; the above comment was just the nominator signifying that he was happy with the ALT hook proposed by someone else. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
    • Symbol confirmed.svg Hook is fine – cites from Argumenty i Fakty and Channel 1 Russia are sufficient supporting material (bearing in mind our approach is to provide sources which are sufficient back-up for fact checking). I'm trusting Piotrus's review on the rest of the article. SFB 14:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)