Template:Did you know nominations/Appian Way Productions

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Appian Way Productions

Improved to Good Article status by FrB.TG (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Satisfies newness requirement, having passed GA assessment on 21 December. The hook is referenced and interesting. QPQ has been met, so I think this is ready to go. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Template:Ping you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. You have not mentioned article length, neutrality, or close paraphrasing checks. Yoninah (talk) 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Template:U, my understanding was that having passed GA review was evidence that those three criteria were met. I confirm that I have checked and they are satisfied. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Well, our experience has shown that GA is not DYK, and we often find close paraphrasing in GA articles. (Sometimes we even submit them for reassessment.) Thank you for confirming those extra checks. Restoring your approval tick. Yoninah (talk) 23:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)