Template:Did you know nominations/Anne Boutiaut Poulard
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 06:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Anne Boutiaut Poulard, Omelette de la mère Poulard
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Anne Boutiaut Poulard
- Omelette de la mère Poulard )
... that an omelette is one of the major tourist attractions in Mont-Saint-Michel? Source: https://www.tribuneindia.com/2006/20061015/spectrum/main5.htm "Besides the abbey, the other major tourist attraction is the omelette popularised by Mere Poulard meaning ‘Mother Poulard’."
ALT1: ... that an omelette created by Mother Poulard (pictured) is one of the major tourist attractions in Mont-Saint-Michel, France? Source: same
Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 12:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC).
- Template:Re Here's my review. epicgenius (talk) 16:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Anne Boutiaut Poulard Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thanks for starting review, Template:U, I've added France to ALT1. And yes, I just created the omelette stub this morning, I was thinking the same thing! --valereee (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re No problem. Omelette de la mère Poulard just falls short of eligibility by 500 characters, but if you do have additional information to add to bring it past the 1500-byte limit, I'll check it. Let me know what you think. epicgenius (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:U, that would be great! I don't think I've ever done a double hook. I think I've got it (barely) to the min, and I have another review I can spend if it looks like it's going to make the cut. Thanks! --valereee (talk) 21:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re No problem, here's the review for the omelette article. epicgenius (talk) 01:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:U, that would be great! I don't think I've ever done a double hook. I think I've got it (barely) to the min, and I have another review I can spend if it looks like it's going to make the cut. Thanks! --valereee (talk) 21:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Re No problem. Omelette de la mère Poulard just falls short of eligibility by 500 characters, but if you do have additional information to add to bring it past the 1500-byte limit, I'll check it. Let me know what you think. epicgenius (talk) 19:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for starting review, Template:U, I've added France to ALT1. And yes, I just created the omelette stub this morning, I was thinking the same thing! --valereee (talk) 18:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Omelette de la mère Poulard Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Unfortunately given the amount of copying between articles the omelette article is short of the required original prose count. Nikkimaria (talk) 10:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Summoned here by bot; sorry, didn't see it go by. If we wait a little longer I can bring it up to snuff. I'm out of town right now with terrible internet so am not able to do much productive edting. I have no objection to dropping the omelette article to unbolded if anyone's in a hurry, though, either. --valereee (talk) 10:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- valereee, there are currently 127 approved nominations waiting to be promoted to prep, almost 16 days worth. We should absolutely wait for you to return and do the article expansion when you're ready. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:U I think I've addressed Template:U's concerns, if you want to recheck! --valereee (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Approved. The expanded omelette article is 2.3k bytes in prose, with about 400 bytes shared between the two articles. The rest of the review is per the above. epicgenius (talk) 13:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)