Template:Did you know nominations/Allenville Mill Storehouse

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 19:50, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Allenville Mill Storehouse

Allenville Mill Storehouse - stone building on roadside

  • ... that Allenville Mill Storehouse (pictured) was erroneously considered to be a mill, not a storehouse, for almost one hundred years?

Improved to Good Article status by ChrisGualtieri (talk). Nominated by 3family6 (talk) at 17:30, 21 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg 3family6, according to the new DYK rules that went into effect when the RfC about them closed late on November 20, all nominations, both self-nominations as previously and nominations of articles by others, now require QPQs if the nominator has at least five prior nominations of any kind. Since you do, a QPQ review will be required for this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, Template:U. I did notice the rule update shortly after I posted these nominations. I will get on supplying QPQs.--¿3family6 contribs 04:28, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Great. Sorry to have to bother you for it, and that the timing wasn't better. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
No problem. I've had a busy past couple days at my job and GA reviewing, so I haven't had time to get to DYK yet.--¿3family6 contribs 05:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Reviewed: Battle of Luang Namtha

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed now that QPQ has been supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:19, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This is a recently promoted Good Article. It is long enough and was nominated within the correct time scale. The hook fact is cited, the image is appropriately licensed, the article is neutral and I detected no close paraphrasing or other policy issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)