Template:Did you know nominations/Alice Gray

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Alice Gray

Origami Christmas tree at the American Museum of Natural History
Origami Christmas tree at the American Museum of Natural History

Created by Rhododendrites (talk). Self-nominated at 23:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC).


  1. REDIRECT Template:•Symbol redirect vote 4.svg No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 04:55, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 5022 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 31.5% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  1. REDIRECT Template:•No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 01:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Comment - Hope including all three image options doesn't create a syntax issue. The tree(s) only sensibly go with the first hook, and ALT2 doesn't go with either. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:08, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Date & length ok. The article is neutral and fully cited to adequately reliable sources. No copyright/paraphrasing problems apparent. (The hit noted by the bot is to sourced quotations.) Hooks are interesting, short enough and check out with the online source. Both images appear in the article, have appropriate licenses and look ok at size. The origami butterfly image seems the most eye-catching but is not linked to any of the current hooks (it was not designed by her) so probably should not be used. QPQ done. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Thanks for the review. The image of the butterfly is indeed not her design, but named after her by a well-known origami artist and thus appears in several works. That's not to say it's appropriate/relevant enough, though. The hook I had in mind for it was ALT1, but that doesn't mention that particular butterfly, and adding a hook along the lines of "...that she had an origami design named after her" doesn't seem as interesting as the others. My preference is for the main hook and one of the tree images (probably File:Origami Christmas Tree (316908922) (cropped - tree only).jpg). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • I agree completely, Rhododendrites. You might consider removing the butterfly image to reduce the possibility of confusion. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:23, 3 September 2016 (UTC)