Template:Did you know nominations/2014 Japanese Grand Prix

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

2014 Japanese Grand Prix

5x expanded by MWright96 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Some issues found.
    • This article was not created or 5x expanded within the past 7 days. This article has been expanded from 5739 characters to 27963 chars of readable prose since 16:08, 08 July 2016 (UTC), a 4.87-fold expansion, 732 short of a 5x expansion.
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 27963 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 59.0% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:58, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Confirm everything the bot said, though at 30068 characters, it does exceed 5x. I would say the hooks are verified (no champagne spraying means the accident did overshadow the winner, and the word "overshadow" is used in the second paragraph of the "Post-race" section). The other hook facts have inline citations supporting them. Nice work. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)