Template:Did you know nominations/2000–01 Louisville Cardinals men's basketball team

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 17:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

2000–01 Louisville Cardinals men's basketball team

Created/expanded by Sportsguy17 (talk). Self nominated at 22:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Article has 1377 characters, short of the 1500 needed for DYK noms. Thingg 01:07, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I will be adding some more tommorow. I will not be online today since its Christmas. Best, Sportsguy17 (TC) 18:11, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Template:U I added another section, which should have made it 1500 characters. Sportsguy17 (TC) 02:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Article is now long enough, but unless I am missing something, the supplied ref does not mention Crum's tenure. Thus, the suggested fact is unsupported at current. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping -- I have changed the reference there, so now the hook is referenced. Sportsguy17 (TC) 15:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Perhaps I am overlooking it, but I don't see the hook fact in the new reference either. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping -- I added an ALT1, which is most definitely supported by the given reference and I tried to find others for the main hook, so lets try the new hook. Sportsguy17 (TC) 00:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Accept Alt 1. Article length fine, hook is referenced with a direct reference, but it is reliable because it's just saying that he has the most wins, not anything arguable. Source includes a quotation parameter, hook is under 200 characters. Nice :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 03:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam


  • Comment: The hooks says "the most wins". The article says "winningest", which may refer to the highest winning percentage instead. Crum happens to be both. Can this be clarified in the article, please? Also, please mention 675 in the article if this needs to be in the hook. --PFHLai (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2014 (UTC)