Template:Infobox US Supreme Court case/testcases

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Hylton v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued February 23, 1796
Decided March 8, 1796
Full case nameDaniel Hylton, Plaintiff in Error v. The United States
Citations3 U.S. 171 (more)
3 Dall. 171; 1 L. Ed. 556; 1796 U.S. LEXIS 397; 2 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 2155
Related casesRelated text???
Case history
PriorDefendant convicted, Circuit Court for the District of Virginia
SubsequentNone
Holding
A tax on the possession of goods is not a "direct" tax, which must be apportioned under Article I of the Constitution.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Oliver Ellsworth
Associate Justices
James Wilson · William Cushing
James Iredell · William Paterson
Samuel Chase
Case opinions
SeriatimChase
SeriatimPaterson
SeriatimIredell
SeriatimWilson
Ellsworth and Cushing took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. I
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Hylton v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued February 23, 1796
Decided March 8, 1796
Full case nameDaniel Hylton, Plaintiff in Error v. The United States
Citations3 U.S. 171 (more)
3 Dall. 171; 1 L. Ed. 556; 1796 U.S. LEXIS 397; 2 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 2155
Related casesRelated text???
Case history
PriorDefendant convicted, Circuit Court for the District of Virginia
SubsequentNone
Holding
A tax on the possession of goods is not a "direct" tax, which must be apportioned under Article I of the Constitution.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Oliver Ellsworth
Associate Justices
James Wilson · William Cushing
James Iredell · William Paterson
Samuel Chase
Case opinions
SeriatimChase
SeriatimPaterson
SeriatimIredell
SeriatimWilson
Ellsworth and Cushing took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. I
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Marbury v. Madison
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued February 11, 1803
Decided February 24, 1803
Full case nameWilliam Marbury v. James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States
Citations5 U.S. 137 (more)
1 Cranch 137; 2 L. Ed. 60; 1803 U.S. LEXIS 352
Case history
PriorOriginal action filed in U.S. Supreme Court; order to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue, December 1801
Holding
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Marshall
Associate Justices
William Cushing · William Paterson
Samuel Chase · Bushrod Washington
Alfred Moore
Case opinion
MajorityMarshall, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington[lower-alpha 1]
Laws applied
U.S. Const. arts. I, III; Judiciary Act of 1789 § 13
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Marbury v. Madison
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued February 11, 1803
Decided February 24, 1803
Full case nameWilliam Marbury v. James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States
Citations5 U.S. 137 (more)
1 Cranch 137; 2 L. Ed. 60; 1803 U.S. LEXIS 352
Case history
PriorOriginal action filed in U.S. Supreme Court; order to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue, December 1801
Holding
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Marshall
Associate Justices
William Cushing · William Paterson
Samuel Chase · Bushrod Washington
Alfred Moore
Case opinion
MajorityMarshall, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington[lower-alpha 1]
Laws applied
U.S. Const. arts. I, III; Judiciary Act of 1789 § 13
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Allgeyer v. Louisiana
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued January 6, 1897
Decided March 1, 1897
Full case nameE. Allgeyer & Co. v. Louisiana
Citations165 U.S. 578 (more)
17 S. Ct. 427; 41 L. Ed. 832; 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1998
Case history
PriorTrial court held for defendant, Allgeyer. Louisiana Supreme Court reversed. 48 La. Ann. 104.
Holding
Template:Ordered list
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
Stephen J. Field · John M. Harlan
Horace Gray · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · George Shiras Jr.
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Case opinion
MajorityPeckham, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Allgeyer v. Louisiana
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued January 6, 1897
Decided March 1, 1897
Full case nameE. Allgeyer & Co. v. Louisiana
Citations165 U.S. 578 (more)
17 S. Ct. 427; 41 L. Ed. 832; 1897 U.S. LEXIS 1998
Case history
PriorTrial court held for defendant, Allgeyer. Louisiana Supreme Court reversed. 48 La. Ann. 104.
Holding
Template:Ordered list
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
Stephen J. Field · John M. Harlan
Horace Gray · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · George Shiras Jr.
Edward D. White · Rufus W. Peckham
Case opinion
MajorityPeckham, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Schenck v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued January 8–10, 1919
Decided March 3, 1919
Full case nameCharles T. Schenck v. United States, Elizabeth Baer v. United States
Citations249 U.S. 47 (more)
63 L. Ed. 470; 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2223; 17 Ohio L. Rep. 26; 17 Ohio L. Rep. 149
Case history
PriorDefendants convicted, E.D. Pa.; motion for new trial denied, 253 F. 212 (E.D. Pa. 1918)
SubsequentNone
Holding
Defendant's criticism of the draft was not protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to the enlistment and recruiting service of the U.S. armed forces during a state of war.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinion
MajorityHolmes, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I; Template:Usc
Overruled by
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Schenck v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued January 8–10, 1919
Decided March 3, 1919
Full case nameCharles T. Schenck v. United States, Elizabeth Baer v. United States
Citations249 U.S. 47 (more)
63 L. Ed. 470; 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2223; 17 Ohio L. Rep. 26; 17 Ohio L. Rep. 149
Case history
PriorDefendants convicted, E.D. Pa.; motion for new trial denied, 253 F. 212 (E.D. Pa. 1918)
SubsequentNone
Holding
Defendant's criticism of the draft was not protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to the enlistment and recruiting service of the U.S. armed forces during a state of war.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Edward D. White
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Case opinion
MajorityHolmes, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I; Template:Usc
Overruled by
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
United States v. Behrman
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued March 7, 1922
Decided March 27, 1922
Full case nameUnited States v. Behrman
Citations258 U.S. 280 (more)
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
United States v. Behrman
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued March 7, 1922
Decided March 27, 1922
Full case nameUnited States v. Behrman
Citations258 U.S. 280 (more)
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.William H. Taft
Associate Justices
Joseph McKenna · Oliver W. Holmes Jr.
William R. Day · Willis Van Devanter
Mahlon Pitney · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · John H. Clarke
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Klaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued May 1–2, 1941
Decided June 2, 1941
Full case nameKlaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Citations313 U.S. 487 (more)
61 S. Ct. 1020; 85 L. Ed. 1477; 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1298; 49 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 515
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Harlan F. Stone · Owen Roberts
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Frank Murphy
Case opinion
MajorityReed, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Klaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued May 1–2, 1941
Decided June 2, 1941
Full case nameKlaxon Company v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Citations313 U.S. 487 (more)
61 S. Ct. 1020; 85 L. Ed. 1477; 1941 U.S. LEXIS 1298; 49 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 515
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Harlan F. Stone · Owen Roberts
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Frank Murphy
Case opinion
MajorityReed, joined by unanimous
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Brown v. Board of Education
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued December 9, 1952
Reargued December 8, 1953
Decided May 17, 1954
Full case nameOliver Brown, et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al.
Citations347 U.S. 483 (more)
74 S. Ct. 686; 98 L. Ed. 873; 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2094; 53 Ohio Op. 326; 38 A.L.R.2d 1180
Case history
PriorJudgment for defendants, 98 F. Supp. 797 (D. Kan. 1951)
SubsequentJudgment on relief, Template:Ussc (Brown II); on remand, 139 F. Supp. 468 (D. Kan. 1955); motion to intervene granted, 84 F.R.D. 383 (D. Kan. 1979); judgment for defendants, 671 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Kan. 1987); reversed, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989); vacated, Template:Ussc (Brown III); judgment reinstated, 978 F.2d 585 (10th Cir. 1992); judgment for defendants, 56 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Kan. 1999)
Holding
Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal. District Court of Kansas reversed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
Case opinion
MajorityWarren, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education (1899)
Berea College v. Kentucky (1908)
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Brown v. Board of Education
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued December 9, 1952
Reargued December 8, 1953
Decided May 17, 1954
Full case nameOliver Brown, et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al.
Citations347 U.S. 483 (more)
74 S. Ct. 686; 98 L. Ed. 873; 1954 U.S. LEXIS 2094; 53 Ohio Op. 326; 38 A.L.R.2d 1180
Case history
PriorJudgment for defendants, 98 F. Supp. 797 (D. Kan. 1951)
SubsequentJudgment on relief, Template:Ussc (Brown II); on remand, 139 F. Supp. 468 (D. Kan. 1955); motion to intervene granted, 84 F.R.D. 383 (D. Kan. 1979); judgment for defendants, 671 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Kan. 1987); reversed, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989); vacated, Template:Ussc (Brown III); judgment reinstated, 978 F.2d 585 (10th Cir. 1992); judgment for defendants, 56 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Kan. 1999)
Holding
Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal. District Court of Kansas reversed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas
Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
Case opinion
MajorityWarren, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education (1899)
Berea College v. Kentucky (1908)
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
North Carolina v. Pearce
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued February 24, 1969
Decided June 23, 1969
Full case nameState of North Carolina et al. v. Clifton A. Pearce v. William S. Rice
Citations395 U.S. 711 (more)
89 S. Ct. 2072; 23 L. Ed. 2d 656
Case history
PriorIn the first case, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, 274 F.Supp. 116, granted writ and the warden appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 396 F.2d 499, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 922, 89 S.Ct. 258, 21 L.Ed.2d 258. In the second case, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, ordered the prisoner's release and appeal was taken. The United States Court of Appeals, 397 F.2d 253, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 932, 89 S.Ct. 292, 21 L.Ed.2d 268.
Subsequentlimited by Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794, 109 S. Ct. 2201, 104 L. Ed. 2d 865 (1989)
Holding
Trial court denied respondents' due process right by imposing a heavier sentence to punish respondent for having his original conviction set aside.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
MajorityStewart, joined by Brennan and Warren
ConcurrenceDoulas, joined by Marshall
ConcurrenceWhite
Concur/dissentBlack
Concur/dissentHarlan
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; U.S. Const. amend. V
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
North Carolina v. Pearce
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued February 24, 1969
Decided June 23, 1969
Full case nameState of North Carolina et al. v. Clifton A. Pearce v. William S. Rice
Citations395 U.S. 711 (more)
89 S. Ct. 2072; 23 L. Ed. 2d 656
Case history
PriorIn the first case, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, 274 F.Supp. 116, granted writ and the warden appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 396 F.2d 499, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 922, 89 S.Ct. 258, 21 L.Ed.2d 258. In the second case, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, ordered the prisoner's release and appeal was taken. The United States Court of Appeals, 397 F.2d 253, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 932, 89 S.Ct. 292, 21 L.Ed.2d 268.
Subsequentlimited by Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794, 109 S. Ct. 2201, 104 L. Ed. 2d 865 (1989)
Holding
Trial court denied respondents' due process right by imposing a heavier sentence to punish respondent for having his original conviction set aside.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
MajorityStewart, joined by Brennan and Warren
ConcurrenceDoulas, joined by Marshall
ConcurrenceWhite
Concur/dissentBlack
Concur/dissentHarlan
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; U.S. Const. amend. V
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Ashe v. Swenson
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued November 13, 1969
Decided April 6, 1970
Full case nameBob Fred Ashe, Petitioner v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden
Citations397 U.S. 436 (more)
90 S. Ct. 1189; 25 L. Ed. 2d 469; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 54
Holding
Retrying an acquitted defendant for the same offense by citing a different victim is an unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
PluralityStewart, joined by Douglas, White, Marshall
ConcurrenceBlack
ConcurrenceHarlan
ConcurrenceBrennan, joined by Douglas, Marshall
DissentBurger
Laws applied
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Template:Ussc
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Ashe v. Swenson
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued November 13, 1969
Decided April 6, 1970
Full case nameBob Fred Ashe, Petitioner v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden
Citations397 U.S. 436 (more)
90 S. Ct. 1189; 25 L. Ed. 2d 469; 1970 U.S. LEXIS 54
Holding
Retrying an acquitted defendant for the same offense by citing a different victim is an unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
PluralityStewart, joined by Douglas, White, Marshall
ConcurrenceBlack
ConcurrenceHarlan
ConcurrenceBrennan, joined by Douglas, Marshall
DissentBurger
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Template:Ussc
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued March 24, 2009
Reargued September 9, 2009
Decided January 21, 2010
Full case nameCitizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission
Docket no.[[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 08-205]
Citations558 U.S. 310 (more)
130 S. Ct. 876; 175 L. Ed. 2d 753; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 766
ArgumentOral argument
ReargumentReargument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorMotion for preliminary injunction denied, 530 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2008); probable jurisdiction noted, 555 U.S. 1028 (2008).
Holding
The provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act restricting unions, corporations, and profitable organizations from independent political spending and prohibiting the broadcasting of political media funded by them within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary election violate the First Amendment's protections of freedom of speech. United States District Court for the District of Columbia reversed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas (all but Part IV); Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor (only as to Part IV)
ConcurrenceRoberts, joined by Alito
ConcurrenceScalia, joined by Alito; Thomas (in part)
Concur/dissentStevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Concur/dissentThomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 1990. McConnell v. FEC, 2003 (in part).
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued March 24, 2009
Reargued September 9, 2009
Decided January 21, 2010
Full case nameCitizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission
Docket no.[[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 08-205]
Citations558 U.S. 310 (more)
130 S. Ct. 876; 175 L. Ed. 2d 753; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 766
ArgumentOral argument
ReargumentReargument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
PriorMotion for preliminary injunction denied, 530 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2008); probable jurisdiction noted, 555 U.S. 1028 (2008).
Holding
The provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act restricting unions, corporations, and profitable organizations from independent political spending and prohibiting the broadcasting of political media funded by them within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary election violate the First Amendment's protections of freedom of speech. United States District Court for the District of Columbia reversed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas (all but Part IV); Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor (only as to Part IV)
ConcurrenceRoberts, joined by Alito
ConcurrenceScalia, joined by Alito; Thomas (in part)
Concur/dissentStevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
Concur/dissentThomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 1990. McConnell v. FEC, 2003 (in part).
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Crawford v. Washington
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued November 10, 2003
Decided March 8, 2004
Full case nameMichael D. Crawford v. Washington
Citations541 U.S. 36 (more)
124 S. Ct. 1354; 158 L. Ed. 2d 177; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 1838; 72 U.S.L.W. 4229; 63 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1077; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 181
Case history
PriorDefendant convicted, Thurston County Superior Court, 11-19-99; reversed, 107 Wn. App. 1025 (2001); reversed, conviction reinstated, 54 P.3d 656 (Wash. 2002); certiorari granted, 539 U.S. 914 (2003)
SubsequentNone
Holding
The use at trial of out of court statements made to police by an unavailable witness violated a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
ConcurrenceRehnquist, joined by O'Connor
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VI
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Ohio v. Roberts (1980)
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Crawford v. Washington
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued November 10, 2003
Decided March 8, 2004
Full case nameMichael D. Crawford v. Washington
Citations541 U.S. 36 (more)
124 S. Ct. 1354; 158 L. Ed. 2d 177; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 1838; 72 U.S.L.W. 4229; 63 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1077; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 181
Case history
PriorDefendant convicted, Thurston County Superior Court, 11-19-99; reversed, 107 Wn. App. 1025 (2001); reversed, conviction reinstated, 54 P.3d 656 (Wash. 2002); certiorari granted, 539 U.S. 914 (2003)
SubsequentNone
Holding
The use at trial of out of court statements made to police by an unavailable witness violated a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Case opinions
MajorityScalia, joined by Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
ConcurrenceRehnquist, joined by O'Connor
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VI
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
Ohio v. Roberts (1980)
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Sykes v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued January 12, 2011
Decided June 9, 2011
Full case nameSykes v. United States
Docket no.[[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 09-11311]
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorSentence enhancement affirmed, 598 F.3d 334 (7th Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 561 U. S. ___ (2010)
Holding
Felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor
ConcurrenceThomas
DissentScalia
DissentKagan, joined by Ginsburg
Laws applied
Overruled by
Johnson v. United States (2015)
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
Sykes v. United States
Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Argued January 12, 2011
Decided June 9, 2011
Full case nameSykes v. United States
Docket no.[[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 09-11311]
Citations564 U.S. 1 (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorSentence enhancement affirmed, 598 F.3d 334 (7th Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 561 U. S. ___ (2010)
Holding
Felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityKennedy, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor
ConcurrenceThomas
DissentScalia
DissentKagan, joined by Ginsburg
Overruled by
Johnson v. United States (2015)
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
Sandbox code Current code
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24". [[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Due to illnesses, Justices William Cushing and Alfred Moore did not sit for oral argument or participate in the Court's decision.

Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".