Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Hylton v. United States |
---|
 | Argued February 23, 1796 Decided March 8, 1796 |
---|
Full case name | Daniel Hylton, Plaintiff in Error v. The United States |
---|
Citations | 3 U.S. 171 (more) |
---|
Related cases | Related text??? |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Defendant convicted, Circuit Court for the District of Virginia |
---|
Subsequent | None |
---|
Holding |
---|
A tax on the possession of goods is not a "direct" tax, which must be apportioned under Article I of the Constitution. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Oliver Ellsworth
- Associate Justices
- James Wilson · William Cushing
James Iredell · William Paterson Samuel Chase
| Case opinions |
---|
Seriatim | Chase |
---|
Seriatim | Paterson |
---|
Seriatim | Iredell |
---|
Seriatim | Wilson |
---|
Ellsworth and Cushing took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. art. I |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Hylton v. United States |
---|
 | Argued February 23, 1796 Decided March 8, 1796 |
---|
Full case name | Daniel Hylton, Plaintiff in Error v. The United States |
---|
Citations | 3 U.S. 171 (more) |
---|
Related cases | Related text??? |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Defendant convicted, Circuit Court for the District of Virginia |
---|
Subsequent | None |
---|
Holding |
---|
A tax on the possession of goods is not a "direct" tax, which must be apportioned under Article I of the Constitution. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Oliver Ellsworth
- Associate Justices
- James Wilson · William Cushing
James Iredell · William Paterson Samuel Chase
| Case opinions |
---|
Seriatim | Chase |
---|
Seriatim | Paterson |
---|
Seriatim | Iredell |
---|
Seriatim | Wilson |
---|
Ellsworth and Cushing took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. art. I |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Marbury v. Madison |
---|
 | Argued February 11, 1803 Decided February 24, 1803 |
---|
Full case name | William Marbury v. James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States |
---|
Citations | 5 U.S. 137 (more) |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Original action filed in U.S. Supreme Court; order to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue, December 1801 |
---|
Holding |
---|
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Marshall
- Associate Justices
- William Cushing · William Paterson
Samuel Chase · Bushrod Washington Alfred Moore
| Case opinion |
---|
Majority | Marshall, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington[lower-alpha 1] |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. arts. I, III; Judiciary Act of 1789 § 13 |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Marbury v. Madison |
---|
 | Argued February 11, 1803 Decided February 24, 1803 |
---|
Full case name | William Marbury v. James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States |
---|
Citations | 5 U.S. 137 (more) |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Original action filed in U.S. Supreme Court; order to show cause why writ of mandamus should not issue, December 1801 |
---|
Holding |
---|
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 is unconstitutional to the extent it purports to enlarge the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court beyond that permitted by the Constitution. Congress cannot pass laws that are contrary to the Constitution, and it is the role of the judiciary to interpret what the Constitution permits. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Marshall
- Associate Justices
- William Cushing · William Paterson
Samuel Chase · Bushrod Washington Alfred Moore
| Case opinion |
---|
Majority | Marshall, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington[lower-alpha 1] |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. arts. I, III; Judiciary Act of 1789 § 13 |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Brown v. Board of Education |
---|
 | Argued December 9, 1952 Reargued December 8, 1953 Decided May 17, 1954 |
---|
Full case name | Oliver Brown, et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al. |
---|
Citations | 347 U.S. 483 (more) |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Judgment for defendants, 98 F. Supp. 797 (D. Kan. 1951) |
---|
Subsequent | Judgment on relief, Template:Ussc (Brown II); on remand, 139 F. Supp. 468 (D. Kan. 1955); motion to intervene granted, 84 F.R.D. 383 (D. Kan. 1979); judgment for defendants, 671 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Kan. 1987); reversed, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989); vacated, Template:Ussc (Brown III); judgment reinstated, 978 F.2d 585 (10th Cir. 1992); judgment for defendants, 56 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Kan. 1999) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal. District Court of Kansas reversed. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
- Associate Justices
- Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
| Case opinion |
---|
Majority | Warren, joined by unanimous |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. XIV | This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education (1899) Berea College v. Kentucky (1908) |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Brown v. Board of Education |
---|
 | Argued December 9, 1952 Reargued December 8, 1953 Decided May 17, 1954 |
---|
Full case name | Oliver Brown, et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka, et al. |
---|
Citations | 347 U.S. 483 (more) |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Judgment for defendants, 98 F. Supp. 797 (D. Kan. 1951) |
---|
Subsequent | Judgment on relief, Template:Ussc (Brown II); on remand, 139 F. Supp. 468 (D. Kan. 1955); motion to intervene granted, 84 F.R.D. 383 (D. Kan. 1979); judgment for defendants, 671 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Kan. 1987); reversed, 892 F.2d 851 (10th Cir. 1989); vacated, Template:Ussc (Brown III); judgment reinstated, 978 F.2d 585 (10th Cir. 1992); judgment for defendants, 56 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Kan. 1999) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Segregation of students in public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, because separate facilities are inherently unequal. District Court of Kansas reversed. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
- Associate Justices
- Hugo Black · Stanley F. Reed
Felix Frankfurter · William O. Douglas Robert H. Jackson · Harold H. Burton Tom C. Clark · Sherman Minton
| Case opinion |
---|
Majority | Warren, joined by unanimous |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. XIV | This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education (1899) Berea College v. Kentucky (1908) |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]North Carolina v. Pearce |
---|
 | Argued February 24, 1969 Decided June 23, 1969 |
---|
Full case name | State of North Carolina et al. v. Clifton A. Pearce v. William S. Rice |
---|
Citations | 395 U.S. 711 (more) 89 S. Ct. 2072; 23 L. Ed. 2d 656 |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | In the first case, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, 274 F.Supp. 116, granted writ and the warden appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 396 F.2d 499, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 922, 89 S.Ct. 258, 21 L.Ed.2d 258. In the second case, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, ordered the prisoner's release and appeal was taken. The United States Court of Appeals, 397 F.2d 253, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 932, 89 S.Ct. 292, 21 L.Ed.2d 268. |
---|
Subsequent | limited by Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794, 109 S. Ct. 2201, 104 L. Ed. 2d 865 (1989) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Trial court denied respondents' due process right by imposing a heavier sentence to punish respondent for having his original conviction set aside. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
- Associate Justices
- Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Stewart, joined by Brennan and Warren |
---|
Concurrence | Doulas, joined by Marshall |
---|
Concurrence | White |
---|
Concur/dissent | Black |
---|
Concur/dissent | Harlan |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; U.S. Const. amend. V |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]North Carolina v. Pearce |
---|
 | Argued February 24, 1969 Decided June 23, 1969 |
---|
Full case name | State of North Carolina et al. v. Clifton A. Pearce v. William S. Rice |
---|
Citations | 395 U.S. 711 (more) 89 S. Ct. 2072; 23 L. Ed. 2d 656 |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | In the first case, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, 274 F.Supp. 116, granted writ and the warden appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 396 F.2d 499, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 922, 89 S.Ct. 258, 21 L.Ed.2d 258. In the second case, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh, ordered the prisoner's release and appeal was taken. The United States Court of Appeals, 397 F.2d 253, affirmed and certiorari was granted. 393 U.S. 932, 89 S.Ct. 292, 21 L.Ed.2d 268. |
---|
Subsequent | limited by Alabama v. Smith, 490 U.S. 794, 109 S. Ct. 2201, 104 L. Ed. 2d 865 (1989) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Trial court denied respondents' due process right by imposing a heavier sentence to punish respondent for having his original conviction set aside. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Earl Warren
- Associate Justices
- Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr. Potter Stewart · Byron White Thurgood Marshall
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Stewart, joined by Brennan and Warren |
---|
Concurrence | Doulas, joined by Marshall |
---|
Concurrence | White |
---|
Concur/dissent | Black |
---|
Concur/dissent | Harlan |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; U.S. Const. amend. V |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission |
---|
 | Argued March 24, 2009 Reargued September 9, 2009 Decided January 21, 2010 |
---|
Full case name | Citizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission |
---|
Docket no. | [[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 08-205] |
---|
Citations | 558 U.S. 310 (more) |
---|
Argument | Oral argument |
---|
Reargument | Reargument |
---|
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Motion for preliminary injunction denied, 530 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2008); probable jurisdiction noted, 555 U.S. 1028 (2008). |
---|
Holding |
---|
The provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act restricting unions, corporations, and profitable organizations from independent political spending and prohibiting the broadcasting of political media funded by them within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary election violate the First Amendment's protections of freedom of speech. United States District Court for the District of Columbia reversed. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas (all but Part IV); Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor (only as to Part IV) |
---|
Concurrence | Roberts, joined by Alito |
---|
Concurrence | Scalia, joined by Alito; Thomas (in part) |
---|
Concur/dissent | Stevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
---|
Concur/dissent | Thomas |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. I, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act | This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 1990. McConnell v. FEC, 2003 (in part). |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission |
---|
 | Argued March 24, 2009 Reargued September 9, 2009 Decided January 21, 2010 |
---|
Full case name | Citizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission |
---|
Docket no. | [[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 08-205] |
---|
Citations | 558 U.S. 310 (more) |
---|
Argument | Oral argument |
---|
Reargument | Reargument |
---|
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Motion for preliminary injunction denied, 530 F. Supp. 2d 274 (D.D.C. 2008); probable jurisdiction noted, 555 U.S. 1028 (2008). |
---|
Holding |
---|
The provisions of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act restricting unions, corporations, and profitable organizations from independent political spending and prohibiting the broadcasting of political media funded by them within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary election violate the First Amendment's protections of freedom of speech. United States District Court for the District of Columbia reversed. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas (all but Part IV); Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor (only as to Part IV) |
---|
Concurrence | Roberts, joined by Alito |
---|
Concurrence | Scalia, joined by Alito; Thomas (in part) |
---|
Concur/dissent | Stevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor |
---|
Concur/dissent | Thomas |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. I, Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act | This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 1990. McConnell v. FEC, 2003 (in part). |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Crawford v. Washington |
---|
 | Argued November 10, 2003 Decided March 8, 2004 |
---|
Full case name | Michael D. Crawford v. Washington |
---|
Citations | 541 U.S. 36 (more) 124 S. Ct. 1354; 158 L. Ed. 2d 177; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 1838; 72 U.S.L.W. 4229; 63 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1077; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 181 |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Defendant convicted, Thurston County Superior Court, 11-19-99; reversed, 107 Wn. App. 1025 (2001); reversed, conviction reinstated, 54 P.3d 656 (Wash. 2002); certiorari granted, 539 U.S. 914 (2003) |
---|
Subsequent | None |
---|
Holding |
---|
The use at trial of out of court statements made to police by an unavailable witness violated a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.William Rehnquist
- Associate Justices
- John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy David Souter · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Scalia, joined by Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |
---|
Concurrence | Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. VI | This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | Ohio v. Roberts (1980) |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Crawford v. Washington |
---|
 | Argued November 10, 2003 Decided March 8, 2004 |
---|
Full case name | Michael D. Crawford v. Washington |
---|
Citations | 541 U.S. 36 (more) 124 S. Ct. 1354; 158 L. Ed. 2d 177; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 1838; 72 U.S.L.W. 4229; 63 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1077; 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 181 |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Defendant convicted, Thurston County Superior Court, 11-19-99; reversed, 107 Wn. App. 1025 (2001); reversed, conviction reinstated, 54 P.3d 656 (Wash. 2002); certiorari granted, 539 U.S. 914 (2003) |
---|
Subsequent | None |
---|
Holding |
---|
The use at trial of out of court statements made to police by an unavailable witness violated a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.William Rehnquist
- Associate Justices
- John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy David Souter · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Scalia, joined by Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer |
---|
Concurrence | Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
U.S. Const. amend. VI | This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | Ohio v. Roberts (1980) |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Sykes v. United States |
---|
 | Argued January 12, 2011 Decided June 9, 2011 |
---|
Full case name | Sykes v. United States |
---|
Docket no. | [[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 09-11311] |
---|
Argument | Oral argument |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Sentence enhancement affirmed, 598 F.3d 334 (7th Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 561 U. S. ___ (2010) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor |
---|
Concurrence | Thomas |
---|
Dissent | Scalia |
---|
Dissent | Kagan, joined by Ginsburg |
---|
Laws applied |
---|
Overruled by | Johnson v. United States (2015) |
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Sykes v. United States |
---|
 | Argued January 12, 2011 Decided June 9, 2011 |
---|
Full case name | Sykes v. United States |
---|
Docket no. | [[[:Template:SCOTUS URL Docket]] 09-11311] |
---|
Citations | 564 U.S. 1 (more) |
---|
Argument | Oral argument |
---|
Case history |
---|
Prior | Sentence enhancement affirmed, 598 F.3d 334 (7th Cir. 2010); certiorari granted, 561 U. S. ___ (2010) |
---|
Holding |
---|
Felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. | Court membership |
---|
- Chief Justice
- Expression error: Unexpected < operator.John Roberts
- Associate Justices
- Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
| Case opinions |
---|
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor |
---|
Concurrence | Thomas |
---|
Dissent | Scalia |
---|
Dissent | Kagan, joined by Ginsburg |
---|
Overruled by | Johnson v. United States (2015) |
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
Sandbox code
|
Current code
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|
[[Category:Template:Pagetype with short description]]Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Expression error: Unexpected < operator.Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".Lua error: Internal error: The interpreter has terminated with signal "24".
|