Template:Did you know nominations/Madison Street Bridge (Portland, Oregon)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Madison Street Bridge (Portland, Oregon)
- ... that a committee of eight Portland, Oregon, residents purchased the Madison Street Bridge in 1891 for over $3.8 million in 2015 dollars?
Created/expanded by Another Believer (talk) and SJ Morg (talk). Nominated by Jsayre64 (talk) at 03:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 16:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4303 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (10.7% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- No overall issues detected
✓ The media File:Madison street bridge ca 1900.jpg is free-use- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 132 characters
- ✓ Jsayre64 has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Moses Bensinger was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:53, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I just reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Moses Bensinger, by the way. Jsayre64 (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
ExpandReview discussions. Lourdes |
---|
- Thanks, but please note that the image that was submitted with the nomination has not been verified as freely licensed (except by the bot). Per the discussion on this page, its copyright status remains unclear, and it should not be used on the Main Page. There is an alternative image that is free, but would likely not be considered good enough for Main Page use. SJ Morg (talk) 09:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Template:U you're absolutely right. When you deleted the image within the main article after I had requested so, I had assumed it would be removed from your hook too. Given the probable quality of the sole image left in the article, my suggestion would be to remove all images from the hook/this nomination. That would be more than acceptable. If you're okay with it, I'll take the liberty to remove the image from this nomination. Thanks. Lourdes 10:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Regarding the AGF-type check mark: Actually, the hook fact is cited to page 7 of the Bottenberg book, and that page of the book (but not the others) can be viewed online. After article expansion, the link to page 7 had been given only in the "Cited works" section, but I have now added it back to the inline citations of that page. Therefore, if you want to take time, you can check it out and (probably) change the AGF check mark to a regular check mark. However, I realize the nom has already been approved for DYK. SJ Morg (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Did a post-hoc approval and have shifted my approval template below these remarks for clarity. Thanks. Lourdes 15:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.