Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Piercebridge
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Battle of Piercebridge, Battle of Tadcaster
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Battle of Piercebridge
- Battle of Tadcaster )
- ... that Royalist victories at the battles of Piercebridge and Tadcaster
sixfive days apart in December 1642 shifted the balance of power in Yorkshire in their favour? Source: Cooke 2006 p. 133.
- QPQs: Gerry Culliton and Bactris jamaicana
Created by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 21:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC).
Battle of Piercebridge is long enough (3016 chars), new enough (created 29 Feb, nominated 3 March) and article is within policy. AGF on offline sources
Battle of Tadcaster is long enough (5523 chars), new enough (created 29 Feb, nominated 3 March) and article is within policy. Again, AGF on offline sources
Hook is short enough, interesting, and supported by inline sources at Battle of Tadcaster#Aftermath
QPQs not yet done
Overall, the contents of the articles are fine, but Template:U please provide 2 QPQs, then I can pass this nomination. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks for the review, I have now added the QPQs. Harrias talk 17:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
-
- Template:Ping actually, Battle of Tadcaster contains 1783 characters of text duplicated from Battle of Piercebridge. Per Rule A5, this text cannot be counted toward the 1500-character requirement. But the new text in the Battle and Aftermath sections more than meets the 1500-character criteria for this article. Yoninah (talk) 17:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I am not seeing an inline cite in either article for the date on which the battle started — a key part of the hook fact. Yoninah (talk) 17:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks for letting me know. This should be resolved now. Harrias talk 10:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Ping thank you. The Piercebridge date checks out in the source, but the cite for Tadcaster says they stormed the town on 6 December. Yoninah (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks Template:U. Got myself in a bit of a muddle with this one, but now should be sorted. Harrias talk 08:47, 16 April 2020 (UTC)