Template:Did you know nominations/Inter-Services Intelligence activities in India

Inter-Services Intelligence activities in India

• ( Back to T:TDYK
• Article history )

• ... that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency supported the Khalistan movement, in order to take revenge against India for its help in liberation of Bangladesh?

• Reviewed: Dakshayagnam (1938 film), Tata Jagriti Yatra, Under the Tree (film), Garin Nugroho, Dronningegården, Chairil Anwar, Geomagnetic pole, IRAS 17163-3907, Goethe–Schiller Monument (Syracuse), Wales at the 2011 Commonwealth Youth Games, 2012 LinkedIn hack, Consulate General of Germany, Bangalore

Created/expanded by Vibhijain (talk). Self nom at 08:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

• Article is long enough.Hooks seems good and interesting.Aye! ≫TheStrike Σagle≪ 09:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
• Can you please correct the hook to "...that Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency is accused of supporting Khalistan movement...", the same way this fact is mentioned in the article. Besides the source you have mentioned in the article says this fact a little differently which you might want to look again to correct it. --SMS ^Talk 21:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

• Please have an another look at the source, it clearly says,"the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) has supported this organization for a long time". And the offline source clarifies the revenge thing. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 06:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

  Can you please cite here the relevant text from the offline source for us? --SMS ^Talk 16:24, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

• You may check it yourself, I have added the link on the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 17:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

  Ok now that I have checked it, I think it is a case of source falsification besides the South Asian Terrorism Portal doesn't look like a reliable source. --SMS ^Talk 17:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

• Could you please explain how is it a case of "source falsification". The source clearly says that it was to take revenge. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 07:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

  The source you have used says: "... the key policy-makers in Pakistan, have a number of incentives to support the Khalistan Movement, either covertly or overtly. These are: To seek revenge against India for its help in creating Bangladesh...", not what you have presented as a fact. --SMS ^Talk 16:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I have said that only. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 17:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Incentives do not equal actual support... something like hanging any one who had a motive for the crime without evidence. That is falsification... or WP:SYNTH at the very best. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Its a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Jumping in and rejecting the nom will do nothing in your favour. Tell how is this article non neutral. All your concerns have been already addressed. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 08:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your comment is only redirected at me and has nothing to do with addressing my objection above. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:24, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Objection? Everything is sourced. I write what the source says. If it says "alleged", its has been presented as "alleged". If its proven, its presented as proven. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^{Talk Email} 08:27, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Alleged or proven is a debate for later... it isn't even being said in the source SMS pointed out.. that only says there's incentive. --lTopGunl (talk) 08:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

• The did you know nomination looks like an interesting, new fact and meets criteria. I think this can be promoted. 91.203.96.13 (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)