Difference between revisions of "Template:Featured article candidates/editintro"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>The Evil IP address
m (add {{editintro documentation}} for categorization and documentation purposes)
imported>Ucucha
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div style="padding:8px 8px 8px 8px; background-color:#C0C090; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;">[[Image:Emblem-important-red.svg|30px|right]]</div><div class="NavHead" style="padding:2px 30px 2px 30px; background-color:#FFC; border: 1px solid #C0C090; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;"><div style="background-color:#FFC; text-align: right;">
 
<div style="padding:8px 8px 8px 8px; background-color:#C0C090; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;">[[Image:Emblem-important-red.svg|30px|right]]</div><div class="NavHead" style="padding:2px 30px 2px 30px; background-color:#FFC; border: 1px solid #C0C090; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;"><div style="background-color:#FFC; text-align: right;">
 
<span class="plainlinks"> &nbsp; ''Please report any problems on the [[WT:FAC|Featured article candidates talk page]]'' &nbsp; </span></div>
 
<span class="plainlinks"> &nbsp; ''Please report any problems on the [[WT:FAC|Featured article candidates talk page]]'' &nbsp; </span></div>
 
 
<h3>Read this before submitting an article for featured article candidacy</h3>
 
<h3>Read this before submitting an article for featured article candidacy</h3>
  
Line 8: Line 7:
 
Nominators who are not [http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl significant contributors to the article] should consult regular editors of the article before nomination.  Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve ''critical'' comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.  
 
Nominators who are not [http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl significant contributors to the article] should consult regular editors of the article before nomination.  Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the main thrust of the process is to generate and resolve ''critical'' comments in relation to the criteria, and why such resolution is given considerably more weight than declarations of support.  
  
Users should not add a second FA nomination until the first has gained support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. Please do not split FA candidate pages into subsections using [[Help:Section|header code]] (if necessary, use bolded headings). '''Graphics are discouraged''' (for example, {{done}} or {{not done}}), as they slow down the page load time.  A [[User:GimmeBot|bot]] will [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/archiving|update the article talk page]] after the article is promoted or the nomination archived.
+
Users should not add a second FA nomination while the first is still open. Please do not split FA candidate pages into subsections using [[Help:Section|header code]] (if necessary, use bolded headings). '''Graphics are discouraged''' (for example, {{done}} or {{not done}}), as they slow down the page load time.  A [[User:GimmeBot|bot]] will [[Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/archiving|update the article talk page]] after the article is promoted or the nomination archived.
  
 
</div>{{editintro documentation|page=Template:Featured article candidates/editintro}}
 
</div>{{editintro documentation|page=Template:Featured article candidates/editintro}}

Revision as of 20:54, 7 February 2010

Emblem-important-red.svg
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

This template is preloaded in as an editintro by Template:Featured article candidates, on the "initiate nomination" link.

See also