Difference between revisions of "Template:FGAN"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Deli nk
m (Reverted edits by 31.60.194.38 (talk) to last version by SNUGGUMS)
imported>Frietjes
(use template:require subst per tfd of substchecktop/substcheckbottom)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<includeonly>{{{{{|safesubst:}}}substchecktop|{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}|subst={{{subst|}}}}}</includeonly>===Failed "good article" nomination===
+
<includeonly>{{safesubst:require subst|template=FGAN|1=</includeonly>===Failed "good article" nomination===
 
This article has failed its [[WP:Good article nominations|Good article nomination]]. This is how the article, as of {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTDAY}}, {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTYEAR}}, compares against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|six good article criteria]]:
 
This article has failed its [[WP:Good article nominations|Good article nomination]]. This is how the article, as of {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTDAY}}, {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTYEAR}}, compares against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|six good article criteria]]:
  
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{closing comments|}}}|{{{closing comments}}}|}}
 
{{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{closing comments|}}}|{{{closing comments}}}|}}
  
−
When these issues are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|renominated]]. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessed]]. Thank you for your work so far.<!-- Template:FGAN --><includeonly>{{{{{|safesubst:}}}substcheckbottom|subst={{{subst|}}}}}</includeonly><noinclude>
+
When these issues are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|renominated]]. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessed]]. Thank you for your work so far.<!<noinclude />-- Template:FGAN --<noinclude />><includeonly>}}</includeonly><noinclude>
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
     PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE
 
     PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE

Latest revision as of 13:56, 14 September 2016

Failed "good article" nomination

This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 20, 2026, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass Pass
2. Verifiable?: Pass Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass Pass
5. Stable?: Pass Pass
6. Images?: Pass Pass


When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage summary

All fields are optional.

{{subst:FGAN
|well written =
|accuracy =
|thorough =
|NPOV = 
|stable = 
|images =
|closing comments = <!-- OPTIONAL -->
}}— ~~~~

Note