Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Hidden Evil"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hawkeye7 (Passed - Moved to Prep Area 3) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
====Star Trek: Hidden Evil==== | ====Star Trek: Hidden Evil==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Star Trek: Hidden Evil|Star Trek: Hidden Evil}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Star Trek: Hidden Evil|Star Trek: Hidden Evil}} | ||
− | + | *... that the video game '''''[[Star Trek: Hidden Evil]]''''' was described by one critic as "2,891 phaser shots connected by some irrelevant puzzles"? | |
− | : | + | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Plastic Brit|Plastic Brit]] |
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]). Self nominated at 14:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]). Self nominated at 14:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
Revision as of 22:47, 7 March 2018
The following is an archived discussion of Star Trek: Hidden Evil's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2013 (UTC).
DYK toolbox |
---|
Star Trek: Hidden Evil
- ... that the video game Star Trek: Hidden Evil was described by one critic as "2,891 phaser shots connected by some irrelevant puzzles"?
- Reviewed: Plastic Brit
5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 14:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC).
Date and expansion OK. But I do have a question about the source, to me it does appear to be a user generated review. Could you allay my concerns by explaining how it is a reliable source or who the author is in relation to gaming please? The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 15:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
- I looked it up and the author isn't a user generated review - there is a bio here of the reviewer. As for Allgame, I presume that they're reliable themselves as they are included in the video games review template as a default. Miyagawa (talk) 15:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Good enough for me. Good to go. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 15:35, 14 April 2013 (UTC)