Difference between revisions of "Template:Failed verification/doc"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎See also: the {{Citation broken}} template, for when a source is unfindable.)
imported>KN2731
m (→‎top: typo)
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Documentation subpage}}
 
{{Documentation subpage}}
 
<!-- PLEASE ADD CATEGORIES AND INTERWIKIS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE ADD CATEGORIES AND INTERWIKIS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE -->
 +
{{tsh|fv}}
  
The {{tl|Failed verification}} tag will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Articles with unsourced statements]]. This [[Wikipedia:Template|template]] is a [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]] and thus is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopedic content.
+
The {{tl|Failed verification}} is used when an editor tried to [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] the information in an article with its sources, but failed to do so. The tag will categorise articles into [[:Category:All articles with failed verification]]. This [[Help:Template|template]] is a [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]] and thus is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopedic content.
  
=== When to use ===
+
== When to use ==
 
Use this tag '''only if''':
 
Use this tag '''only if''':
  
Line 14: Line 15:
 
For example, if the article says that 26% of statistics are made up, and the source says that statistics are made up without giving a percentage, then that information has failed verification. If you are unable to fix the error, then you should tag the information as not matching the named source. If the discrepancy between the source and the article isn't obvious, then please explain the situation in detail on the talk page.
 
For example, if the article says that 26% of statistics are made up, and the source says that statistics are made up without giving a percentage, then that information has failed verification. If you are unable to fix the error, then you should tag the information as not matching the named source. If the discrepancy between the source and the article isn't obvious, then please explain the situation in detail on the talk page.
  
If the source given is an unreachable website, use {{Tlx|Dead link}} instead. See [[Wikipedia:Link rot]] and [[WP:DEADREF]] for more information.
+
If the source given is an unreachable website, keep the source and mark it with {{Tlx|Dead link}} instead. See [[Wikipedia:Link rot]] and [[WP:DEADREF]] for more information.
  
 
If no source is given, and you believe that [[WP:MINREF|an inline citation is necessary]] for that information, then use {{tlx|Citation needed}}.
 
If no source is given, and you believe that [[WP:MINREF|an inline citation is necessary]] for that information, then use {{tlx|Citation needed}}.
Line 20: Line 21:
 
If the source has absolutely no relevance to any part of the article, delete the reference and replace with {{tlx|Citation needed}}.
 
If the source has absolutely no relevance to any part of the article, delete the reference and replace with {{tlx|Citation needed}}.
  
=== How to use ===
+
== How to use ==
'''Placement'''
+
===Placement===
  
 
The template should be placed outside the reference (<code><nowiki><ref> ... </ref></nowiki></code>), within the article's text:
 
The template should be placed outside the reference (<code><nowiki><ref> ... </ref></nowiki></code>), within the article's text:
 
:... 26% of statistics are made up.<code><nowiki><ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Failed verification|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}</code> Next sentence in the article.
 
:... 26% of statistics are made up.<code><nowiki><ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Failed verification|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}</code> Next sentence in the article.
  
'''Common form (with current date)'''
+
===Common form (with current date)===
  
<tt>{&#123;Failed verification|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}</tt>
+
<code>{&#123;Failed verification|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}</code>
  
Link to the section on the talk page with
+
===Optional parameters===
  
:<code>|talk=section name</code>
+
Link to the relevant section on the current page's talk page with:
  
or to a discussion elsewhere with
+
:<code>|talk={{var|Section title}}</code>
  
:<code>|talk page=discussion page</code>
+
or to a discussion elsewhere with:
  
or
+
:<code>|talkpage={{var|Talk:Page name}}</code>
  
:<code>|talk page=discussion page#section name</code>
+
or:
  
===Redirects===
+
:<code>|talkpage={{var|Talk:Page name}}#{{var|Section title}}</code>
 +
 
 +
Add a {{em|brief}} note on the nature of the verification failure with:
 +
 
 +
:<code>|reason={{var|A sentence here.}}</code>
 +
 
 +
This is displayed as a mouse-over tooltip, and may be of use to later editors trying to resolve the verification issue.  It {{strong|must not}} contain any markup, like italics, links, etc., and any use of the double-quote character (<samp>"</samp>) must be escaped, e.g. as <code>&amp;quot;</code> – otherwise the tooltip will break. This is a limitation of HTML, not of the template.
 +
 
 +
== Template data ==
 +
 
 +
{{TemplateDataHeader}}
 +
<templatedata>
 +
{
 +
    "description": "The template will categorize articles into [[:Category:All articles with failed verification]].",
 +
    "params": {
 +
        "date": {
 +
            "label": "Month and year",
 +
            "description": "Provides the month and year (e.g. 'January 2013', but not 'jan13').",
 +
            "type": "string",
 +
            "autovalue": "{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}",
 +
            "suggested": true
 +
        },
 +
      "talk": {
 +
            "label": "Current page's relevant talk section",
 +
            "description": "Title of the appropriate section of the current page's talk page, for further discussion of the verification failure (e.g. 'Section title').",
 +
            "type": "string"
 +
      },
 +
      "talkpage": {
 +
            "label": "Another page's relevant talk section",
 +
            "description": "Title of the appropriate section of another page's talk page, for further discussion of the verification failure (e.g. 'Talk:Page name#Section title').",
 +
            "type": "string"
 +
      },
 +
      "reason": {
 +
            "label": "Reason",
 +
              "description": "A brief note, displayed as a mouse-over tooltip.  May be of use to later editors.",
 +
              "type": "string"
 +
        }
 +
    }
 +
}
 +
</templatedata>
 +
 
 +
==Redirects==
 +
#{{Tl|Badref}}
 +
#{{Tl|Failed ref}}
 +
#{{Tl|Failed reference}}
 +
#{{Tl|Failedverification}}
 +
#{{Tl|Fails verification}}
 +
#{{Tl|FV}}
 
#{{Tl|Fv}}
 
#{{Tl|Fv}}
#{{Tl|FV}}
+
#{{Tl|Ncg}}
 +
#{{Tl|Nicg}}
 
#{{Tl|Not in citation}}
 
#{{Tl|Not in citation}}
 
#{{Tl|Not in citation given}}
 
#{{Tl|Not in citation given}}
 +
#{{Tl|Not in ref}}
 +
#{{Tl|Not in refs}}
 +
#{{Tl|Not in reference}}
 
#{{Tl|Not in source}}
 
#{{Tl|Not in source}}
#{{Tl|Not in reference}}
+
#{{Tl|Not in source given}}
 +
#{{Tl|Not specifically in source}}
 +
#{{Tl|Notincitation}}
 +
#{{Tl|Notincitationgiven}}
 +
#{{Tl|Notinref}}
 
#{{Tl|Notinsource}}
 
#{{Tl|Notinsource}}
#{{Tl|Not specifically in source}}
+
#{{Tl|Notinsourcegiven}}
 
#{{Tl|Verification failed}}
 
#{{Tl|Verification failed}}
#{{Tl|Fails verification}}
+
#{{Tl|Verification-failed}}
  
===See also===
+
==See also==
*[[Wikipedia:Citing sources]]
+
*{{tlx|Failed verification span}}:  Use when inline citations have been supplied which support some portion of the statement in question, but not all of it.
*{{Tl|Citation}}
+
*{{tlx|Text-source inline}}:  Use when multiple inline citations to a source are given, but not all of them support the same information.
*{{Tl|Verify source}}
+
*{{tlx|Unreliable source?}}:  Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.
*{{Tl|Irrelevant citation}}
+
*{{tlx|Unreliable source?|certain{{=}}y}}:  Use when an inline citation to a source is given, but it is an unreliable source.
*{{Tl|Citation broken}}, when a citation does not provide enough information to find the source.
+
*{{Tlx|Cite check}}:  Use when the article or section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations (generates a hatnote).
*{{Tl|Cite check}}, for tagging an article or section that has multiple inappropriate citations
+
*{{tlx|Verify source}}
*{{Tl|Request quotation}}, for requesting a quote from a citation to verify that it has been interpreted correctly
+
* [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], especially [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Unsourced material|Unsourced material]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup#Verifiability and sources]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]
 +
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check]]
  
 
{{Inline tags}}
 
{{Inline tags}}
<includeonly>
+
 
 +
<includeonly>{{Sandbox other||
 
<!-- ADD CATEGORIES BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- ADD CATEGORIES BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[Category:Inline citation and verifiability dispute templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
+
[[Category:Inline citation and verifiability dispute templates]]
 
 
<!-- ADD INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
</includeonly>
 
  
<includeonly>
+
}}</includeonly>
[[es:Plantilla:No en fuente citada]]
 
[[no:Mal:Ikke i angitt kilde]]
 
</includeonly>
 

Latest revision as of 15:03, 16 December 2020

The {{Failed verification}} is used when an editor tried to verify the information in an article with its sources, but failed to do so. The tag will categorise articles into Category:All articles with failed verification. This template is a self-reference and thus is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopedic content.

When to use

Use this tag only if:

  1. an inline citation to a source is given,
  2. you have checked the source,
  3. the source does not support what is contained in the article, and
  4. despite the source not supporting the article, the source still contains useful information on the topic.

For example, if the article says that 26% of statistics are made up, and the source says that statistics are made up without giving a percentage, then that information has failed verification. If you are unable to fix the error, then you should tag the information as not matching the named source. If the discrepancy between the source and the article isn't obvious, then please explain the situation in detail on the talk page.

If the source given is an unreachable website, keep the source and mark it with {{Dead link}} instead. See Wikipedia:Link rot and WP:DEADREF for more information.

If no source is given, and you believe that an inline citation is necessary for that information, then use {{Citation needed}}.

If the source has absolutely no relevance to any part of the article, delete the reference and replace with {{Citation needed}}.

How to use

Placement

The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:

... 26% of statistics are made up.<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Failed verification|date=June 2025}} Next sentence in the article.

Common form (with current date)

{{Failed verification|date=June 2025}}

Optional parameters

Link to the relevant section on the current page's talk page with:

|talk=Section title

or to a discussion elsewhere with:

|talkpage=Talk:Page name

or:

|talkpage=Talk:Page name#Section title

Add a brief note on the nature of the verification failure with:

|reason=A sentence here.

This is displayed as a mouse-over tooltip, and may be of use to later editors trying to resolve the verification issue. It must not contain any markup, like italics, links, etc., and any use of the double-quote character (") must be escaped, e.g. as &quot; – otherwise the tooltip will break. This is a limitation of HTML, not of the template.

Template data

This is the TemplateData documentation for this template used by VisualEditor and other tools; see the monthly parameter usage report for this template.

TemplateData for Failed verification

The template will categorize articles into [[:Category:All articles with failed verification]].

Template parameters

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
Month and yeardate

Provides the month and year (e.g. 'January 2013', but not 'jan13').

Auto value
{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}
Stringsuggested
Current page's relevant talk sectiontalk

Title of the appropriate section of the current page's talk page, for further discussion of the verification failure (e.g. 'Section title').

Stringoptional
Another page's relevant talk sectiontalkpage

Title of the appropriate section of another page's talk page, for further discussion of the verification failure (e.g. 'Talk:Page name#Section title').

Stringoptional
Reasonreason

A brief note, displayed as a mouse-over tooltip. May be of use to later editors.

Stringoptional

Redirects

  1. {{Badref}}
  2. {{Failed ref}}
  3. {{Failed reference}}
  4. {{Failedverification}}
  5. {{Fails verification}}
  6. {{FV}}
  7. {{Fv}}
  8. {{Ncg}}
  9. {{Nicg}}
  10. {{Not in citation}}
  11. {{Not in citation given}}
  12. {{Not in ref}}
  13. {{Not in refs}}
  14. {{Not in reference}}
  15. {{Not in source}}
  16. {{Not in source given}}
  17. {{Not specifically in source}}
  18. {{Notincitation}}
  19. {{Notincitationgiven}}
  20. {{Notinref}}
  21. {{Notinsource}}
  22. {{Notinsourcegiven}}
  23. {{Verification failed}}
  24. {{Verification-failed}}

See also