Difference between revisions of "Template:FGAN"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Frietjes (use template:require subst per tfd of substchecktop/substcheckbottom) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <includeonly> | + | <includeonly>{{safesubst:require subst|template=FGAN|1=</includeonly>===Failed "good article" nomination=== |
This article has failed its [[WP:Good article nominations|Good article nomination]]. This is how the article, as of {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTDAY}}, {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTYEAR}}, compares against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|six good article criteria]]: | This article has failed its [[WP:Good article nominations|Good article nomination]]. This is how the article, as of {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTDAY}}, {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTYEAR}}, compares against the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|six good article criteria]]: | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{closing comments|}}}|{{{closing comments}}}|}} | {{{{{|safesubst:}}}#if:{{{closing comments|}}}|{{{closing comments}}}|}} | ||
| − | When these issues are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|renominated]]. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessed]]. Thank you for your work so far.<!-- Template:FGAN --><includeonly> | + | When these issues are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|renominated]]. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessed]]. Thank you for your work so far.<!<noinclude />-- Template:FGAN --<noinclude />><includeonly>}}</includeonly><noinclude> |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE | PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE | ||
Latest revision as of 13:56, 14 September 2016
Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 24, 2026, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Pass Pass
- 2. Verifiable?: Pass Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass Pass
- 5. Stable?: Pass Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass Pass
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.
Template documentationUsage summary
All fields are optional.
{{subst:FGAN
|well written =
|accuracy =
|thorough =
|NPOV =
|stable =
|images =
|closing comments = <!-- OPTIONAL -->
}}— ~~~~
Note
 | This template employs intricate features of template syntax.
You are encouraged to familiarise yourself with its setup and parser functions before editing the template. If your edit causes unexpected problems, please undo it quickly, as this template may appear on a large number of pages. You can conduct experiments, and should test all major changes, in either this template's sandbox, the general template sandbox, or your user space before changing anything here. |
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:FGAN/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |
